网站导航   4000-006-150  
小站教育
GMAT成绩单完美解读
学生选择在小站备考:30天 525222名,今日申请2805人    备考咨询 >>

【改错精选120练】GMAT官方讲解SC难点实例分析(六十五练)

2015年06月04日16:00 来源:小站整理
参与(0) 阅读(3503)
摘要:GMAT句子改错题是整个GMAT考试中对考生英语语法能力考查要求最高的题型,需要考生具备扎实的语法基础和一定的逻辑分析能力。本文将结合实例分析讲解GMAT句子改错题的解题思路和方法技巧。

GMAT句子改错题(sentence correction),是整个GMAT考试中对考生英语语法能力考查要求最高的题型,也往往是中国学生最为头疼的一类题目。没有扎实的语法基础和一定的逻辑分析能力,想要做好句子改错题难度极高。如何提升GMAT句子改错题的解题能力?下面小编就为大家整理了一些经典例题,结合实例分析为大家讲解GMAT句子改错题的解题思路和方法技巧。

【改错精选120练】GMAT官方讲解SC难点实例分析(六十五练)图1

实例题目:

Digging in sediments in northern China, evidence has been gathered by scientists suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had previously thought.

(A) evidence has been gathered by scientists suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had

(B) evidence gathered by scientists suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than had been

(C) scientists have gathered evidence suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than

(D) scientists have gathered evidence that suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that which was

(E) scientists have gathered evidence which suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that

【改错精选120练】GMAT官方讲解SC难点实例分析(六十五练)图2

选项分析:

(A)evidence has been gathered by scientists suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than they had

【错误】 修饰成分:“Digging in sediments in northern China”应当是“scientists”发出的动作,但根据语法要求,它必须是其后跟随的主谓结构“evidence has been gathered”的状语,修饰的是“has been gathered”,逻辑主语是“evidence”,语义明显不合理。

(B)evidence gathered by scientists suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than had been

【错误】 修饰成分:见(A)。

(C)scientists have gathered evidence suggesting that complex life-forms emerged much earlier than

【正确】 “that”引导的从句“complex life-forms emerged much earlier than previously thought”是“suggesting”的宾语,准确叙述了“evidence”的具体内容。

【大意】 在北中国挖掘沉积物的时候,科学家发现了证据暗示着复杂生命形式出现得比之前认为的还早。

(D)scientists have gathered evidence that suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that which was

【错误1】 句子意思:“evidence”暗示的内容应是“复杂生命形式出现的比之前认为的更早”,而不是“emergence”本身,因此(D)表意逊于(C)使用“complex life-forms emerged much earlier than previously thought”。

【错误2】 固定搭配:不存在用“which”引导的定语从句修饰代词“that”的用法。

(E)scientists have gathered evidence which suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that

【错误】 句子意思:见(D)中。【错误1】

解题思路:

“evidence”无法发出“digging”的动作,立即排除(A)、(B),科学家收集到的证据暗示的是“复杂生命形式出现的比之前认为的更早”这件事,既然是一件事,那么用主谓结构表述语义更加,(C)优于(D)、(E),因此选择(C)。

特别申明:本文内容来源网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请立即与我们联系contactus@zhan.com,我们将及时处理。

GMAT备考资料免费领取

免费领取
看完仍有疑问?想要更详细的答案?
备考问题一键咨询提分方案
获取专业解答

相关文章

GMAT句子改错题如何快速解题?提速心得经验完全分享 这些SC知识点你都知道吗?GMAT句子改错考点分析 【GMAT语法考点】GMAT句子改错7个必考知识点剖析 提高GMAT语法解题正确率应从这5个方面入手 GMAT句子改错SC最实用的4条解题心得归纳整理 GMAT语法6大细节归纳整理 看过才能拿满分 GMAT语法基础知识大盘点 题量和真题特点详细解析 GMAT语法主要难点详细分析 备考心得全面分享

专题推荐

日排行
周排行
版权申明| 隐私保护| 意见反馈| 联系我们| 关于我们| 网站地图| 最新资讯
© 2011-2024 ZHAN.com All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备13042692号-23 举报电话:4000-006-150
沪公网安备 31010602002658号
增值电信业务经营许可证:沪B2-20180682