网站导航     在线客服  
全部
GMAT成绩单完美解读
学生选择在小站备考:30天 482309名,今日申请319人    备考咨询 >>

GMAT分析性写作真实例题及写法完全解析

2014年10月23日11:52 来源:小站整理
参与(0) 阅读(3468)
摘要:GMAT作文复习是考试花费时间较长的一块,需要准备模版,自己练习,看看机经等等。由于题库中的145道Argument题目涉及到了八大类日常推理论中常犯的逻辑错误,所以在Argument这篇文章的准备过程中,逻辑思维至关重要。大家可以通过分析经典例题的方式来掌握一定的分析技巧。

小站教育老师介绍,储备必要的基本的逻辑知识,培养理性的思维方式,力争完成一个逻辑思维从零散到系统,从片面到全面,从肤浅到深刻的蜕变过程,并最终能够对任意一道Argument题目做出一览无余的全面的深刻的批判。考生的论证分析将会由来自各院校不同专业领域的教职人员评估,他们将会就构思和写作的整体质量进行评价。

GMAT分析性写作真实例题及写法完全解析图1

小贴士

1.开始写作前,先分析题目并想好如何作答;

2.整理好思路,充分展开;

3.提供相关的论据和例子。

说明

本部分将要求您针对所提供的论证进行批判性评价。考生不需要就话题给出自己的观点。

例题

The following appeared in the editorial section of a monthly business news magazine:

"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion.

You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

GMAT分析性写作真实例题及写法完全解析图2

答案

The following is an actual AWA essay that received the highest rating:

This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase.

However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausibility of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analyzing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e., coal mine). Before any decision is made, all these things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

特别申明:本文内容来源网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请立即与我们联系contactus#zhan.com,我们将及时处理。
大家都在学

看完这篇文章有何感觉?已经有0人表态,0%的人喜欢

相关文章

GRE和GMAT的区别是什么?这3点分析真的很受用 GMAT官方指南2017上市啦!新版本OG内容变化和新增题... 盘点GMAT备考官方教材 这些复习资料不用都买 GMAT考多少算高分 不同学校对分数要求不尽相同 GMAT模考软件PREP新增2套试题 官方模考又添新选择 2016年GMAT考试题型和解题策略完全汇总 事先预测胸有成竹 总结9条GMAT换库规律 GMAT阅读速度太慢?做到这5点让你的阅读速度大大提高

你可能会喜欢

GMAT考前必做的3件事
GMAT考前必做的3件事
GMAT

100% 的用户喜欢

GMAT阅读3大扣分原因分析
GMAT阅读3大扣分原因分析
GMAT

100% 的用户喜欢

2018美国GMAT实战经验
2018美国GMAT实战经验
GMAT

100% 的用户喜欢

2018GMAT备考核心思维
2018GMAT备考核心思维
GMAT

100% 的用户喜欢

GMAT模考3大核心功能
GMAT模考3大核心功能
GMAT

100% 的用户喜欢

日排行
周排行