网站导航   4000-006-150  
小站教育
GMAT成绩单完美解读
学生选择在小站备考:30天 526421名,今日申请4004人    备考咨询 >>

【备考每日练】GMAT阅读真题精选实例讲解(四十三练)

2015年07月22日15:54 来源:小站整理
参与(0) 阅读(4340)
摘要:小编为大家精心准备了GMAT考试各类题型的练习题和答案解析,帮助大家每日一练,为考试做好准备。本日练习内容为GMAT阅读题。

GMAT备考,除了背背背,更重要的就是练练练!通过练习,巩固知识,熟练技巧,最终才能在GMAT考试中发挥出色,取得好成绩,所以练习的重要性不言而喻。因此,小编为大家精心准备了GMAT考试各类题型的练习题和答案解析,帮助大家每日一练,为考试做好准备。一起来看今天的题目吧。

【备考每日练】GMAT阅读真题精选实例讲解(四十三练)图1

今日练习题为阅读题,题目如下

Eco efficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant cost savings from such innovations. Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting eco efficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. Such innovations reduce production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in eco efficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover, there is no guarantee that increased economic growth from eco efficiency will come in similarly eco efficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even a vastly more eco efficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less eco efficient economy. Senge and Carstedt argue that to preserve the global environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on eco efficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

A explain why a particular business strategy has been less successful than was once anticipated

B propose an alternative to a particular business strategy that has inadvertently caused ecological damage

C present a concern about the possible consequences of pursuing a particular business strategy

D make a case for applying a particular business strategy on a larger scale than is currently practiced

E suggest several possible outcomes of companies’ failure to understand the economic impact of a particular business strategy

2. The passage implies that which of the following is a possible consequence of a company’s adoption of innovations that increase its eco efficiency?

A Company profits resulting from such innovations may be reinvested in that company with no guarantee that the company will continue to make further improvements in eco efficiency.

B Company growth fostered by cost savings from such innovations may allow that company to manufacture a greater number of products that will be used and discarded, thus worsening environmental stress.

C A company that fails to realize significant cost savings from such innovations may have little incentive to continue to minimize the environmental impact of its production processes.

D A company that comes to depend on such innovations to increase its profits and growth may be vulnerable in the global market to competition from old-style eco-inefficient industries.

E A company that meets its eco efficiency goals is unlikely to invest its increased profits in the development of new and innovative eco efficiency measures.

3. According to the passage, an exclusive pursuit of ecoefficiency may cause companies to

A neglect the development of alternative business models and products

B keep the number of products that they manufacture unchanged

C invest capital from increased profits primarily in inefficient and outmoded industries that may prove unprofitable

D overemphasize the production process as the key to increasing profits and growth

E focus more on reducing costs than on reducing the environmental impact of production processes

正确答案:

C B A

【备考每日练】GMAT阅读真题精选实例讲解(四十三练)图2

解题思路:

第一题:

A 文章从没说这个经济策略是否会成功,也没预测过。

B 但是没有这样一个方法实际上被提出。

C line5-7和最后一句话 ,提出建议只是在关心的基础之上,总体还是讲对这个特殊的经济策略的关心。因此选C

D 文章指出了这个策略的缺陷,并没有支持这种策略的扩张。

E 文章关心的是环境的影响,并不关心经济的影响。

第二题:

问题问的是 下面选项里面哪一个是一个可能的后果,对于a company’s adoption of innovations that increase its eco efficiency?

定位原文:Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting eco efficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future.

大概是说adopting eco efficiency innovations可以使环境变坏。

说到环境变坏的选项只有B。

第三题:

读题目an exclusive pursuit of eco efficiency may cause companies to

那么回原文定位必定是有exclusive pursuit of eco efficiency

发现在文章结尾那句话

Focusing exclusively on eco efficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business models.

选项里面提到products和business models的只有A了。

特别申明:本文内容来源网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请立即与我们联系contactus@zhan.com,我们将及时处理。

GMAT备考资料免费领取

免费领取
看完仍有疑问?想要更详细的答案?
备考问题一键咨询提分方案
获取专业解答

相关文章

2016年GMAT考试题型和解题策略完全汇总 GMAT和GRE哪个更难?4个方面详细解答 2016年GMAT考试各项收费完全汇总介绍之官方收费篇 揭秘GMAT考试成绩不为人知的3个秘密 【2016GMAT备考】报名培训班利弊彻底分析 考生怎样在GMAT考场上完全发挥实力?3大技巧讲解 GMAT考场必备的5个细节小贴士分享 GMAT考场上紧张怎么办?4种实用应对技巧来帮忙

专题推荐

日排行
周排行
版权申明| 隐私保护| 意见反馈| 联系我们| 关于我们| 网站地图| 最新资讯
© 2011-2024 ZHAN.com All Rights Reserved. 沪ICP备13042692号-23 举报电话:4000-006-150
沪公网安备 31010602002658号
增值电信业务经营许可证:沪B2-20180682